How Many Web Designers Does It Take To Change A Lightbulb?
Posted on Thursday, September 21st, 2006
Web standards are the backbone of the internet these days. Well built, good looking sites with semantic, valid mark up for the content and CSS controlling the design mean that pages render as they should for all users. Thanks to the W3C the web is a better place for all of us. Or is it?
Lightbulbs?
OK, this post isn’t about the electrician capabilities of your average web designer. It’s my attempt at a metaphor. What I’m really talking about is the fact that standards-aware Web designers and developers are still a tiny minority of the people working in the Web business.
So says Roger Johansson in his recent Vitamin article Why Standards Still Matter. The main focus of the article is that, even though the use of standards is growing amongst developers, we still need to do more. This doesn’t appear to be the opinion of some others though.
Occasionally I hear mutterings from some people who seem to think enough has been said about best practices and that we should find something else to write about. Some say that Web standards aren’t important anymore, because most Web developers are already using them.
Like Roger, I agree that this sentiment is completely wrong. If you search around web designers in your area, even your country, and check out their portfolio (or even their own sites) you can see that the majority of them show a blatent disregard for web standards. Has enough been said? Is it time to talk about something else now? I don’t think so.
What Should We Be Saying Then?
Roger isn’t the only one thinking this way either, where he suggests making a splash in developer forums, writing articles for relevant magazines or even trying to convince teachers and institutions that haven’t caught up yet to change their ways, others, like Robert Nyman, bring it a bit closer to home. In his article The Web Standards War Is Far From Over Robert suggests doing your bit by setting a good example and trying to influence colleagues and clients (hey, they’re the ones paying for it) by showing them the benefits of standards based design.
So What I’m Really Trying To Ask Is…
… how many web designers who use proper standards does it take to influence the whole industry? A bit of a mouthful but an important question. In my opinion, everybody who already understands standards and puts them to good use everyday should be helping encuorage someone else to. If everyone converts another web designer to using standards and they all convert five friends then, following the pyriamid scheme method of things, we’ll have the whole world using standards in no time.
So, if you’re a web designer reading this thinking “He doesn’t know what he’s talking about, the <font> tag is my friend,” then stick around and find out more about standards and what’s so great about them. If, on the other hand, you are thinking “Right on, standards rock!” then go out and tell someone else why, if we all try then we can make a difference.
Lastly, why don’t you tell me, do you know how to use web standards or are you in the dark? Maybe you don’t care either way, since you’re not a designer at all? Don’t forget that your blog (if you have one) is a part of the web too and could benefit from a standards based approach. It might fix your dodgy sidebar anyway. Whatever the case, if you publish paegs on the web, you should be thinking about this.
So What About Your First Question?
OK, if you really want to know:
How many web designers does it take to change a lightbulb?
Three. One to change the structure, one to update the style, and one to blog about the inadequate bulb support offered by today’s socket manufacturers.
But that’s an issue for another time. Thanks to Reid Stott for the joke.
If you enjoyed this post, why not subscribe to Unintentionally Blank
1September 21st, 2006 at 8:12 pm
Brad Smith Says:My Web design portfolio up until a month ago was slowly moving towards a standards compliant type mindset without really knowing it. I started a new job as an IA at the beginning of August and have learned more in the past month than I have in the past 5 years of coding Web sites. Standards compliance is something to be excited about. I take pride in validating my code. It teaches me why structure is important and why coding is more than lines in your editor. It can also be done quite easily, and once you’ve made the transition, even easier to talk about the benefits to sell it later to your colleagues. I worked for a company for the longest time that fought the transition to CSS. I’m glad that I’m now in a role that influences how sites are coded.
2September 21st, 2006 at 10:47 pm
Phil Says:Brad, thanks for commenting. That really is a superb attitude and one that I’m sure the majority of designers who work with standards have (save the guys Roger mentions in his article). As you say, it is almost natural to tend towards standards compliance over time and that’s the way it should be. It is easier to code in, it is better coding practice and it does promote better style.
You do bring up another very relevant point as well. The idea that a design company may resist changing to working with standards, even if some of the workforce know better. Then it is both a struggle, but also a challenge for those who know better, to change the mindset of the decision makers in the company in order to improve the internet as a whole.
I hope your role gives you greater ability to influence other designers as well as just how the sites under your charge are coded.
3September 21st, 2006 at 11:18 pm
Matt Robin Says:Hi Phil - great article to follow-on to Roger’s posts. It’s a bit freaky, but my own article response to Roger’s remarks isn’t a million miles different to yours!! Quite funny really - that’s just a coincidence.
As you can see from my comments in my article, on Roger’s site, the Vitamin site, and Robert Nyman’s site, it has obviously caught my attention. I’m about to add more to this soon (to be announced on my site).
The Web still has a very real need for Web Standards…anyone who’s saying otherwise is really a bit ignorant about what Web Standards is and how it improves the Web for all concerned.
4September 22nd, 2006 at 10:09 am
Phil Says:Hi Matt, thanks for dropping by.
I hope that there are many more designers out there who read all of those articles and also decide to make a stand! That really was the point of Roger’s article and, even as new to the game as I am, I plan to head out on the offensive and try to influence as many others as I can.
I’ll certainly keep an eye on your site to see what resources you provide too.
Pingback by Squarelinkers blog love round 2 — BlogoSquare
April 25th, 2007 at 8:33 pm
5March 17th, 2008 at 1:11 am
marketing and web design Says:great article made me chuckle,
just what you need at this time of night